The Offshore Wire Forum > Offshore Gambling Information > Offshore Sportbooks > TOW latest article - Why WTO ruling is flawed |
Forum Quick Jump
|
|

TOW
Founder

      
Date Joined Mar 2005
Total Posts : 1866
|
Posted 8/29/2005 11:49 AM (GMT -5) |
  |
Why WTO ruling is flawed
by Roberto Castiglioni - © 2005, The Offshore Wire
The World Trade Organization’s ruling in favor of tiny
Antigua against the United States has become an evergreen topic of discussion.
Some may have thought that the discussion was over, considering that the United States was given an order to comply with the ruling by April 2025. Contrary to generalized public acceptance of this ruling by the gaming industry, I believe the ruling is seriously flawed.
Many people may not have noticed that the sole beneficiary jurisdiction of this ruling is Antigua. All other gaming jurisdictions are left out of the benefits granted to the tiny Caribbean island.
This is a major flaw that sets a negative precedent. The WTO was to issue and enforce a ruling to the benefit of gaming jurisdictions in their entirety. With its ruling in favor of plaintiff Antigua only, the WTO becomes an accomplice of a jurisdiction that has no moral grounds to benefit and prosper.
Antigua’s Gaming Commission has failed thus far to amend its past wrong doings. The Authority played a proactive role in protecting Eddie Hadeed, owner of a failed sports book called Alladin Gold.
This was possible thanks to the Hadeed family ties with Antigua’s crooked Prime Minister Bird. While it is generally believed that Antigua has changed since its last political elections, facts prove exactly the opposite.
The Hadeed family has maintained its leverage within the current government. Senator Aziz Hadeed, Eddie’s uncle, is still a minister of the Antiguan government.
No wonder all external attempts to bring Eddie Hadeed to justice, and refund owed players, have been bouncing against the rubber wall that still protects this crook from within the current government.
With Antigua soon to be cashing in additional revenues, I firmly believe the entire gaming industry - starting with the sports books and casinos currently located in this jurisdiction - should take a firm position to support ongoing efforts to have the Alladin Gold disaster amended.
Antigua should not be allowed to benefit from this “financial blessing” unless it delegates a significant portion of its gaming revenues to pay owed players in full.
Honesty and ethics shall prevail over a flawed ruling that, if enforced without solving the Alladin case, will give a free pass to this tiny island and its crooked authorities.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
|

Dante
Registered Member

      
Date Joined Apr 2005
Total Posts : 53
|
Posted 8/29/2005 1:03 PM (GMT -5) |
  |
I just hope something actually GOOD comes of this....it seems like it will be an endless RED tape adventure  |
Back to Top |
|
|
|

TOW
Founder

      
Date Joined Mar 2005
Total Posts : 1866
|
Posted 8/29/2005 5:47 PM (GMT -5) |
  |
|
|
|

RPM
Welcome to TOW

      
Date Joined Jul 2005
Total Posts : 5016
|
Posted 8/29/2005 5:52 PM (GMT -5) |
  |
|
|
|

Big Brother
Registered Member
       
Date Joined Aug 2005
Total Posts : 115
|
Posted 8/29/2005 8:25 PM (GMT -5) |
  |
doesn't this set a precedent that all judgements in the past can be apealed by other countries with gaming ties? |
Back to Top |
|
|
|

RPM
Welcome to TOW

      
Date Joined Jul 2005
Total Posts : 5016
|
Posted 8/29/2005 8:29 PM (GMT -5) |
  |
i would think that would depend on whether or not the countries involved have free trade agreements with the u.s.
anyone know if costa rica does or not? i think they do.... |
Back to Top |
|
|
|

RPM
Welcome to TOW

      
Date Joined Jul 2005
Total Posts : 5016
|
Posted 8/29/2005 9:57 PM (GMT -5) |
  |
pier,
its WAY past that time. i just cant figure out why they are against it. all the revenue they could get is just unreal, and they have to know they arent going to stop it... |
Back to Top |
|
|
|

Big Brother
Registered Member
       
Date Joined Aug 2005
Total Posts : 115
|
Posted 8/29/2005 10:41 PM (GMT -5) |
  |
i'm still curious if anyone thinks the ruling could set any kind of precedent for apeal on this? |
Back to Top |
|
|
|

JC
Registered Member
       
Date Joined Apr 2005
Total Posts : 18
|
Posted 8/30/2005 11:07 AM (GMT -5) |
  |
That's not what the WTO does. Nobody else brought the claim. Somewhere in Antigua's early papers they clearly stated we bring this action on behalf of Antigua and Antigua only. I didn't see any other places lining up to help with the matter when it was in its early stages.
I have not read the latest CAFTA agreement that was recently enacted that applies to Costa Rica. I would bet that the US made sure the commitments DID NOT cover gambling services. And if that is so that would trump any chance CR had to bring an action under the GATS which was the basis for the Antigua case.
Antigua has had one book fail in its history. Las Vegas had one fail years ago. CR has had plenty, so has Curacao. |
Back to Top |
|
|
|

TOW
Founder

      
Date Joined Mar 2005
Total Posts : 1866
|
Posted 8/30/2005 11:16 AM (GMT -5) |
  |
Jay,
I hate to disagree with you but I must in this case. This is what a WTO officer sent me awhile back:
Bernard Kuiten said...
Dear Mr. Castiglioni,
Thank your for sending me this information. I am sure that you are aware of the fact that WTO Appeal proceedings are confidential and that hearings in appeals are not open to the public, or even to other WTO Members who are not participating in the dispute. In addition, the Appellate Body has no jurisdiction to rule on whether or not a Member complies with its domestic laws, nor does it have jurisdiction to award damages; it only has jurisdiction to rule on whether or not a WTO Members complies with the WTO agreements.
I'm afraid therefore that there is no role for the WTO Secretariat nor the Appellate Body in this regard.
Kind regards,
Bernard Kuiten
External Relations Division
World Trade Organization
The ruling applies to ALL jurisdictions members of the WTO, not Antigua only.
As far as Antigua having only one book fold goes....well....I have hard evidence to prove with any court you wish me to appeal to that the Gaming Commission covered up on behalf of Eddie Hadeed. This is direct involvement and implies direct responsibility and liability.
|
Back to Top |
|
|
|

JC
Registered Member
       
Date Joined Apr 2005
Total Posts : 18
|
Posted 8/30/2005 11:25 AM (GMT -5) |
  |
Where does it say that all of their decisions apply to all members? |
Back to Top |
|
|
|

JC
Registered Member
       
Date Joined Apr 2005
Total Posts : 18
|
Posted 8/30/2005 11:41 AM (GMT -5) |
  |
I just got off the phone with one of the WTO attorney's for Antigua. With all due respect, you are 100% wrong. It applies to Antigua only in this matter. Are other countries free to being a similar action and use the Antigua case as precedent? Yes. But the burden is on them to bring the cases.
Bernard Kuiten said...
it only has jurisdiction to rule on whether or not a WTO Members complies with the WTO agreements.
Right, Antigua brought a case and the WTO ruled that ths US was not in compliance with the GATS. It says nothing about automatically applying it to other members.
And like I said, I am pretty sure Costa Rica shot themselves in the foot with their latest CAFTA agreement. |
Back to Top |
|
|
|

Big Brother
Registered Member
       
Date Joined Aug 2005
Total Posts : 115
|
Posted 8/31/2005 12:14 AM (GMT -5) |
  |
damn, i asked for clarification and i just get more confused........ |
Back to Top |
|
|
Forum Information |
Currently it is Tuesday, November 22, 2005 5:46 PM (GMT -5)
There are a total of 34,038 posts in 4,365 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 114 new threads and 590 reply posts. View Active Threads
|
Who's Online |
This forum has 406 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, yokspot.
85 Guest(s), 46 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details
The Touthouse, Tesco Vee, Nostradamus, Jerseymike, Jay88, jakethompson, bdgear, rpolo77, Betmonkey, JC, Dr Black, Rich Coast Line Mover #1, gobucks, ghostposter05, Sneaks, jwunderdog, codeworks, anjac, duke, bigboydan, fathead, Halifax, pier0, JOHNLOGIC, guesser, Mike, spidermonkey, Sharon, sheva, BAUS, slash, tacomax, Doug, seattle slew, 5teamparlay, applepicks, ZED, Rod, nojuicesports, onlòóker, tatehill2000, Skybook Online, RPM, kosar, Utopia, valleycubs |
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3
dotNetBB © 2000-2005 |
|
|